Muncie’s former Wilson Middle School will become Delaware County’s new justice center, as county council members voted narrowly Tuesday morning to approve funding for the multi-million dollar project.  As IPR’s Stephanie Wiechmann reports, that didn’t stop the community from voicing its opposition.

In a standing-room only meeting where people began chanting “No new jail!” and two protestors who unfurled a surprise banner were removed by the Sheriff’s Department, the Delaware County Council moved forward the justice center project by a vote of four to three.  After two years of construction at a cost of $45 million, the former school building will house a 500-bed jail, the county court system, and the Sheriff’s Department.

When time came for public comment, no one spoke in support of the new jail – something that Terry Hoskins pointed out has happened in every meeting on the issue.

“I’ve talked to hundreds of people.  I have yet to meet one person who supports it, except for people who, one way or another, benefit.  And it’s really concerning that the citizens of Muncie are being left out totally on this decision.”

Delaware County’s jail, like many others in the state, is severely overcrowded.  The county has an order from state officials to fix that situation in some way.  County Sheriff Tony Skinner says last week, the current jail saw more than 340 inmates in a space built for 220.  He says though the project is unpopular, it’s desperately needed.

“We don’t house any low level inmates in our jail, because we can’t.  We aren’t housing anybody who are there on misdemeanors because they can’t afford bail.  People who come in on misdemeanors are basically booked and released, unless it’s a domestic battery, a gun charge, or an invasion of privacy.”

Read More: Overcrowded Jails Bill Easily Clears Indiana House

Only one council member explained his vote to the crowd.  Scott Alexander says he voted against the project because of the cost.

“In my opinion – and I’ve done a lot of research on this – the cost of the project is prohibitive.  It’s unrealistic to think that this project, once it’s completed, isn’t going to cost more than what we currently pay.  And I think that what we need to do is take the time and get this right.”

The council approved a funding plan that does not include a property tax backup – something they could have added.  That means for the nearly 20 years the county will pay back construction and bonds with EDIT taxes, officials won’t be able to use extra property tax revenue if money in existing approved accounts falls short.

Correction: A previous version of this story included the costs of the project in the lead-up to a quote from council member Scott Alexander.  It also included a building lease figure that Alexander says is not accurate and will not be part of the bond pay-back.  We regret the error and confusion.